A few weeks ago I wrote about my supervisor making assumptions about what I could or could not do because I have young children at
home.
On the flip side of that is a customer who was required to attend an
orientation. The paperwork explained the session could take up to two hours and
asked participants to plan accordingly. She was one of the last people to
arrive and, to be fair to the other customers who were there before her, she
was not served immediately for the one-on-one session after the orientation.
She was the last person to be served. She mentioned numerous times that she
needed to leave by a certain time to get her young children. Finally, it was
her turn to be seen and she was gone. She noted on her paperwork that she
waited as long as she could, but she could not stay because she needed to get
her little children. I am not unsympathetic to having young children who need
your attention, but if it could affect your benefits why wouldn’t you make sure
you had those two hours (plus travel time) free? What really bugged me was this
mom using her children as pawn to get what she wanted. She did not want to be there,
she did not want to wait and she thought that using her children as an excuse
would allow her to leave before others. I have had my fair share of child care
logistical Tetris, having to find alternative solutions when transportation or
scheduling issues arise, so again I am not unsympathetic to the difficulties
one can face. But, even I could swing two hours to attend an important meeting.
So, as much as I didn’t like my supervisor assuming me having young children
should preclude me from having to do something, I also don’t like when parents
use their children as a means to try to avoid something. That is playing into
the mindset that parents of young children are less-productive than staff with
no children or older kids.
No comments:
Post a Comment