This morning I had to email about a respite need for this
weekend and since I didn’t know who our new case worker was, I sent it to the
supervisor (who has been my temporary stand-in case worker twice in the past).
She responded with our new case worker's name and email and I was sort of disappointed. While
doing the planning meeting last month, our most recent case worker brought
along a new worker who got to hear a LOT about our case. This new case
worker was mentioned as one of two possibilities for our assigned case worker.
I found out this morning it is not her. And I’m bummed because this means our
case worker is a total stranger. I haven’t met her yet, so I have no ill-will
or bad blood towards her, I just wished it had been someone who knew something –
at least we’d be getting a familiar face. I’m not sure when we will meet our
new case worker, I imagine soon, and I have to just remain positive about it
and ease her into things. From scratch. Sigh.
Yesterday I was conversing with a new employee at work.
Being new she didn’t really know anything about me, things I assume most of my
co-workers know because A) there aren’t that many of us, B) I’m friend with a
bunch of them on Facebook and that lends itself to knowing things, and C) I’ve
worked here for six years and things just have a way of being known in that
amount of time. So, we were talking and I made mention of the baby forgetting
that she didn’t know I was a foster-adopt parent. I thought it was obvious,
looking at the pictures at my desk, that we aren’t biologically related, but apparently
she didn’t think about it the same way. So we chatted a bit about a family she
knew who adopted a girl (and didn’t tell her she was adopted until she was 7!)
and then wanted to adopt again and got twins, a boy and girl. For whatever reason,
this made her question if I was “done” after I adopted the little ones. Oddly
enough, no one has ever asked me this question before. I answered honestly,
stating I didn’t know, I feel like I’m fairly young (and bless her heart she
thought I was closer to her age, which is a whole decade younger than I am!) so
I just don’t know what the future might hold. I would like to keep fostering,
but at the present time I am lacking room to do so. With this idea in my mind I
happened across a fellow foster-adopt blog in which the writer questioned if
she wanted a second child and listed many pros and cons to raising a single
child or multiple children. Clearly I’m already past the single child state,
and even if I did only want one child, none of the children in my care are only
children, they all have siblings. I grew up the oldest of three (and this was
also mentioned in the post, how one grew up tends to color how one views siblings
versus no siblings) and never considered having just one child. In fact,
growing up I wanted a BIG family. But, this fellow blogger mentioned how she
felt she could be a better mom to just one child and might feel spread too
thin if she had/adopted a second. I have been single for nearly all of my
fostering journey and, with the exception of a few cases, I have always had multiple
kids in my home at the same time (my first placement came alone, as did my
second - Primero also came alone but it
wasn’t too long before Love Bug came home). Often times I felt it was easier to
have at least two kids because they could occupy one another when I needed to do
household chores and things like that. Only one time did I feel overwhelmed by the
number of children and it was really because the older girls were rather wild
(not naughty, just untrained) and I had never cared for a newborn before, which
made for an interesting time. Eventually, we got into a groove and I was able to
manage just fine, but the first week or so was touch and go. My mothering skills
have improved since then and I’m sure I would face the same situation totally
differently today than I did three years ago (has it really been that
long?!?!). But, I’m questioning myself now – am I selfish to be raising three
kids alone? When things were really off the hook last month with Esperanza, I
had reached out to my mom for some emotional support. Instead, I found her to
be unsupportive, telling me I couldn’t do “this” on my own (when I told her
being a single parent is HARD) and I should just narrow the field to Primero alone.
Basically, I had no business raising three kids, was her opinion. Because I
showed some weakness, because I showed I was human and therefore vulnerable. I
was very hurt by this, especially because it made me feel like I really couldn’t
handle things AND it made me feel like she doesn’t care about the little ones –
they are like an unused appliance to be shipped off to someone who can find use
in them. I’m sure she didn’t mean to come off that way, but that’s sort of how
it sounded. I think I shall be pondering this issue for a while now, thinking if
I’m doing the right thing by forging on alone. Am I enough for these three
kids? Am I enough for Love Bug and Chica Marie as a single mom? Primero has
made it clear that he prefers to be raised by a single mother, so I don’t doubt
so much with him. Just the babies because surely the county could find them a
loving two parent home with ease. But, am I selfish to want to keep them and adopt
them all by myself?
No idea a if I'm the blogger you're referring to (I did indeed write such a post) but either way, I only know that I enjoyed being an only child and feel that my particular child does best as an only child. We also have a travel lifestyle and do many activities each week which cost money, so I couldn't afford plane tickets and admissions for more than one. Our family is best as one, and my sanity and the lifestyle I want works best with one, for me. But I certainly think if I wanted two or more than I would be more than enough for all of my children, single or otherwise. If you are a loving and supportive mom, you will be enough. If you want a big family, you will find a way to make it work.
ReplyDeleteI hope you will never feel selfish for having more than one. There are so many pros to having lots of siblings, just as there are cons. You do what is in your heart to do!
Yes, it was your blog and then a second one I found via Google. I think I worry more about being single and raising multiple kids. It isn't easy, especially since these kiddos have been through traumatic things and so right off the bat they take more time and energy to parent (not that parenting a non-traumatized child isn't time consuming). We interact with about a thousand professionals and no one has mentioned the possibility that the children's emotional parenting needs aren't being met. I have been instructed to spend more time with Chica Marie alone to better strengthen our bond because she is a particularly needy child when it comes to attention and affection. If anything, the most comments I receive are in relation to me finding time for myself because I spend too much time (as in all my time) making sure the children are not lacking in attention from me. At this point in time, the three children that I have are bonded to one another. Primero is a great big brother and both Love Bug and Chica Marie adore him to the ends of the earth. I don't think any of them want to be only children (you know, except for those days when the other kids are driving you nuts!) although I never asked them. And, as I said in my post, none of my kids would be only children even if they were my only child. Primero has two older brothers, an older sister and two younger sisters. Love Bug and Chica Marie are the youngest two of a total of 9 kids (and Chica Marie is very attached to her older sister who is going to live with their grandmother). I think the posts I read were good for me, just to consider things and not go willy-nilly into it, as is my tendency. So, thank you for providing me with the opportunity to think things through! :)
ReplyDelete