The permanency hearing this morning went better than I had
thought it would. There was an awkward moment, while waiting to go into the
court room, when mom’s attorney was ranting about CYS. I didn’t hear how the
conversation started, but I did hear him mention about a bonding evaluation
that would show the children, who haven’t been allowed to visit with their
mother, have bonded to their foster parent, “of course.” I cannot tell you how
derogatory he sounded, how it seemed like the very word “foster parent” left a
foul taste on his tongue. He went on to describe a case he argued in the state
Supreme Court about the rights of a father who was incarcerated and not permitted
early release due to the words of one parole officer who felt this man was
gaming the system. His tirade was cut short by the county case worker announcing
we could go into the court room. It’s clear to see that he is all one-sided for
paternal rights, which I suppose makes sense since that is his job, to make
sure the parents who are his clients get a fair deal. As a foster parent, I
just don’t have the luxury of being one-sided and have to see this case and all
cases from multiple sides, so I can be engaged in the action and try to stay
empathetic towards the parents, who don’t have it easy and make the everyday
decisions for what I believe is best for the children. I have to see both sides
of the coin, no matter how painful or difficult it might be.
Once we were inside the court room things moved fairly
quickly. There was a lot of discussion about Mini Momma and how she needs help
to understand what is happening because she asked the magistrate when she can
see her mom again. The magistrate declared she wouldn’t entertain the idea of
visitation simply because there was a date set for TPR, which she wasn’t aware
of initially. She said there would be no point for her to make a ruling, only
to have it all rehashed at the TPR hearing next month. The mom’s attorney asked
about keeping sibling contact, but he asked it in a way that made it sound like
Chica Marie and Love Bug would be adopted and Mini Momma would not. This lead
the county case worker to believe mom might voluntarily sign-off on TPR for the
little ones, but I’m not so sure. There was talk about how Grandma has been
pushing for the younger siblings to see and meet their older siblings and how
she has managed to make that happen for all but one older sibling. A new permanency
hearing was set for the end of April, pending whatever happens in December.
After the hearing I spoke with the county case worker about
my concerns regarding an older sibling. She seemed to indicate what I had heard
from a previous case worker was not correct and there would be no harm in the
little ones spending time with their older siblings. I expressed how I am not
opposed to those visits and contact but I felt like Grandma went behind my back
when she had the kids a few weekends ago because she made no mention to me
about her plans, just sent me a picture via text. I would like to know who the
children will be exposed to and I too would like to meet their older siblings.
I could facilitate visits with the older siblings, if they so choose, once I am
able to meet them. But, if Grandma always acts as middle man, that limits the
exposure the little ones would have to only when they are visiting Grandma. I
think my actions speak for themselves when it comes to sibling visits. I
pursued visits with Mini Momma, following her from foster home to foster home,
making sure the little ones could still see her. She has spent more than a few
weekends at our place and the door is always open for her to be in contact with
her younger brother and sister. I can point to many, many examples of visits
with Primero and his siblings, including making sure his older brother Hermano
got to spend time with his family during holidays when he was in foster care. I
mean, my two main baby-sitters are Primero’s oldest brother's girlfriend and his
cousin. We spend holidays with Primero’s family, we’ve driven to see his mom,
to attend his brother’s baby shower. I literally can do nothing more to prove I
support family, especially sibling, involvement. I just think there is a proper
way to do it that doesn’t create hard feelings or make it seem duplicitous.
So, it seems like the TPR hearing might actually happen next
month. The county case worker told me she has over 90 pages of information for
the hearing. I’m thankful we do not have to attend that court hearing, especially
after the county case worker told me this would go all the way back to the
beginning. I’m fairly certain I would sit and sob if I had to be there
listening to every little thing that has happened right before and since
placement. It is sort of a shitty time for TPR to be happening, just before
Christmas, not that there is ever a good time to permanently lose custody of
your children. As I knew she would, mom asked me where the kids were when she
saw me. I had some pictures I printed out and gave to her, including the school
picture for Chica Marie and a drawing she had colored. It certainly doesn’t
take the place of seeing her children and I know that and I feel bad for her.
Her lawyer brought up Act 101 during the session and I’m sort of surprised it
wasn’t mentioned to me previously. My inclination is to do things as naturally as
possible and I just don’t like the idea of someone telling me what I must do
with the children. Act 101 is a legally enforceable visitation agreement
entered into by adoptive parents and biological family. I would rather we agree
to be in touch, exchange information and visit as we are able and see fit, so
long as mom stays in a healthy place. I don’t really want a set-in-stone
agreement stating we MUST see her x amount of times per month or year or
whatever. Grandma and I are already in contact and arranging visits as our
schedules allow. I don’t feel like we need some legal document telling us to
keep doing what we are already doing. I would welcome the little one’s mom to
get in touch with me so we could talk about visitations.
I’ve been feeling sort of down about adoption lately. I
think I have finally come to a place where I am ready to face my own misconceived
notions about adoption. I have known, from a young age, that I wanted to adopt.
I remember having a conversation with my mom about my aunt who was never able
to have children. I remember asking my mom why my aunt and uncle didn’t “just
adopt.” I declared, right then and there, if I were ever unable to have
children (because, that so wasn’t going to happen to me) I would adopt. When my
mom met the woman who is now my nurse midwife, they had a conversation about my
willingness to adopt. My mom’s friend, who adopted her daughter from China, gave
her a book to give to me; “The Waiting Child” by Cindy Champnella. As a young
adult remembering my declaration, this book solidified my decision to adopt. I
just assumed things would go as I had planned. I would get married, have 3
children and then when my kids were on the verge of leaving the nest, I would
adopt a younger child or two. It seemed so perfect. It’s just not how it
happened. Now, nearly a year after my first son was adopted, I have really come
to understand the intricacies of “just” adopting. And, while I know it is the
right decision for me and I would do it all over again if I had to, it isn’t
easy. Sharing your child with people you don’t know is hard. Learning to accept
people you don’t always respect is hard. Knowing you family is complicated
because there are so many different people with different opinions is hard.
Learning to let go of the ideals you had for your family, learning to let go of
the moral code you had hoped to instill in your children, is hard. Being ok
with raising a child who doesn’t acknowledge your influence in his life and
seems eager to be done with you, is hard. Feeling like you might never have
sovereign control over your children is hard. Sharing holidays, accepting new
traditions and life styles is hard. Witnessing the pain of a child betrayed by
family and seeing the heartache of family not raising their biological kin is
hard. Explaining to a child seeing their mother is not a good idea is hard.
Hearing stories of a tumultuous and difficult past is hard. Staying positive
about someone who has made some very poor choices and cannot seem to take
responsibility for them is hard. Always being a bigger person, willing to
forgive and move forward is hard. Nothing, nothing at all about adoption is
easy except for loving a child. I never doubted I would be able to love a child
not biologically connected to me. But, love is not enough. And that is hard.
Following your blog and some other women who adopted has made me understand how complicated the whole thing can be. I hate when people ask me why I don't "just adopt" as if it is a really easy thing. Also it is not the right choice for everyone.
ReplyDeleteYou are absolutely right - it is hard, complicated and not for everyone. Don't get me wrong, I still think it is worth it and was a right choice for me, but I was formerly one of the scoffers, one of the "just" adopters. I think it has impeded my ability to see adoption for what it is and has made the emotional side of adoption much harder on me because I insisted in believing it was a substitute for biologically producing a child. It is not. Not even a little bit. Thank you for voicing your understanding. :)
Delete